Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Hardware/software secureIDs - pros and cons. |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:18:37 -0400 |
I think hardware is better because there are many precautions you can take to stop hardware from being reverse-engineered, but with software it's just compiled code, right? Wouldn't it be easier to find the seed out?
> What are the pros and cons for using hardware RSA SecureID/Other and > software with the same characteristics?
Main argument for using hardware: Security. There's no feasible way for an attacker to get the seed value. If it's software, then compromised machine => compromised seed value => attacker can login whenever he/she choose to.
A con would be that the token can be forgotten or lost, whereas if it's software then depending on where you have it (PC, cell phone) you'll always have it available. If the device with the software crashes, you can always just install it elsewhere and enter the seed value again.
I also believe the price favors the use of software.
Another option to discuss is whether it's perceived as easier by the end-user with a physical token or a software installation. This might depend on where the software is installed. If it's a browser toolbar and you're logging on to a web site, then I guess that's pretty nice. But if it's installed on a cell phone or PDA, a physical token would probably be perceived as easier since the numbers are readily available without any extra steps.
Greets, CJ
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Swap Out your SPI or Watchfire app sec solution for Cenzic's robust, accurate risk assessment and management solution FREE - limited Time Offer
http://www.cenzic.com/wf-spi ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- - /dev/null We are the Pentium of Borg. Division is futile. You will be approximated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Swap Out your SPI or Watchfire app sec solution for Cenzic's robust, accurate risk assessment and management solution FREE - limited Time Offer
http://www.cenzic.com/wf-spi ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Google Developer's kit ?, AdamT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Hardware/software secureIDs - pros and cons., AdityaK |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Hardware/software secureIDs - pros and cons., Carl-Johan Bostorp |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Hardware/software secureIDs - pros and cons., Levenglick, Jeff |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |