Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Port Scanning Issues |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:22:32 +0100 |
A Chairde,
Havin, some issues with scanning stacks on my system.
1. Using Superscan4 , I scan stack UDP-TCP 1-65534 , Sometimes I
get no ports open , another time I get 49159 UDP Ports open, only get port report, no attempt made to open any ports ... , when get open ports , I always get 49159 UDP Ports ...... , use the scanner at 250msecs , takes around 16 hours to finish.
2. Using Languard, Nessus and Retina , get different scans from each tool, any ideas why, how do I find out real ports open.. differences can be 10,000 ports
UDP port-scanning does not always give reliable results. Have a look at the nmap man page for UDP scanning ( nmap -sU target.example.com ). In the man page Fyodor suggests using nmap -sU -sV to attempt to fingerprint any services which are running on UDP ports.
"UDP scan works by sending an empty (no data) UDP header to every targeted port. If an ICMP port unreachable error (type 3, code 3) is returned, the port is closed. Other ICMP unreachable errors (type 3, codes 1, 2, 9, 10, or 13) mark the port as filtered. Occasionally, a service will respond with a UDP packet, proving that it is open. If no response is received after retransmissions, the port is classified as open|filtered. This means that the port could be open, or perhaps packet filters are blocking the communication. Versions scan (-sV) can be used to help differentiate the truly open ports from the filtered ones.
A big challenge with UDP scanning is doing it quickly. Open and filtered ports rarely send any response, leaving Nmap to time out and then conduct retransmissions just in case the probe or response were lost. Closed ports are often an even bigger problem. They usually send back an ICMP port unreachable error. But unlike the RST packets sent by closed TCP ports in response to a SYN or connect scan, many hosts rate limit ICMP port unreachable messages by default. Linux and Solaris are particularly strict about this. For example, the Linux 2.4.20 kernel limits destination unreachable messages to one per second (in net/ipv4/icmp.c).
Nmap detects rate limiting and slows down accordingly to avoid flooding the network with useless packets that the target machine will drop. Unfortunately, a Linux-style limit of one packet per second makes a 65,536-port scan take more than 18 hours. Ideas for speeding your UDP scans up include scanning more hosts in parallel, doing a quick scan of just the popular ports first, scanning from behind the firewall, and using --host-timeout to skip slow hosts."
cheers, Jamie -- Jamie Riden, CISSP / jamesr@europe.com / jamie@honeynet.org.uk UK Honeynet Project: http://www.ukhoneynet.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat? Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Crestron pen testing?, j eric townsend |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Port Scanning Issues, Vijay |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Port Scanning Issues, sherwyn . williams |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Port Scanning Issues, Vijay |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |