Please take a littler time to think about your statement.
First, if we allow people to scan and test sites without permission,
then there is an automatic "get out of goal free card" for all
attackers. Just say "sorry officer, I was just testing the security at
the bank for their own good".
Vigilantees are not nice friendly and helpful people. They are people
who break the law - it is all rather simple. I do not want to have
people going about the streets checking to ensure that I have locked my
silver cabinet after first breaking down the door (as it is not solid 6"
oak with 10 layers of dead-lock). Likewise, I do not want to have people
thinking that they are offering some type of service "testing" systems
without permission.
At best they make a determination of the "real" attackers more
difficult. At worst, where do you draw the line. They have attacked but
did not get into the site in a manner to do any real damage - so they
must just be doing good?
"Good Samaritan" - Bah! If the person is truly a "good Samaritan" as you
feel than why they are not doing this officially. There are numerous
charities, non-profits, start-ups, etc that need services and can not
afford them. A "good Samaritan" is one who offers a valid service to
something such as this without doing it for the publicity - and they
offer it Pro Bono.
They ask first. They get permission.
People who assume that they have a right to do what they want, do this
by assuming the rights of others.
In contradiction to the belief of many on the list, people have a right
to be stupid and live in ignorance. I may not like this, but it is a
fundamental tenant of freedom. To have freedom means the right to be
daft. The right to be daft means the right to have an insecure site.
They will learn eventually.
Regards,
Craig
Craig Wright
Manager of Information Systems
Direct : +61 2 9286 5497
Craig.Wright@bdo.com.au
+61 417 683 914
BDO Kendalls (NSW)
Level 19, 2 Market Street Sydney NSW 2000
GPO BOX 2551 Sydney NSW 2001
Fax +61 2 9993 9497
www.bdo.com.au
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
in respect of matters arising within those States and Territories of Australia
where such legislation exists.
The information in this email and any attachments is confidential. If you are
not the named addressee you must not read, print, copy, distribute, or use in
any way this transmission or any information it contains. If you have received
this message in error, please notify the sender by return email, destroy all
copies and delete it from your system.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and not
necessarily endorsed by BDO Kendalls. You may not rely on this message as
advice unless subsequently confirmed by fax or letter signed by a Partner or
Director of BDO Kendalls. It is your responsibility to scan this communication
and any files attached for computer viruses and other defects. BDO Kendalls
does not accept liability for any loss or damage however caused which may
result from this communication or any files attached. A full version of the
BDO Kendalls disclaimer, and our Privacy statement, can be found on the BDO
Kendalls website at http://www.bdo.com.au or by emailing
administrator@bdo.com.au.
BDO Kendalls is a national association of separate partnerships and entities.
-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com]
On Behalf Of Lee Lawson
Sent: Thursday, 31 May 2007 4:25 AM
To: Steve Friedl; pen-test@securityfocus.com
Cc: James Wilburn; security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects...
True, that might be a better idea, send everything you have found and
make no further contact.
Isn't it a great shame that we find it dangerous and difficult to
inform organisations that their security has holes in it? Why do they
immediately jump on the offensive and accuse the good Samaritan of
hacking? Just accept the information and make yourself more secure!
Simple.
I suppose that sometimes, they just don't deserve the help.
On 5/30/07, Steve Friedl <steve@unixwiz.net> wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:14:39AM +0100, Lee Lawson wrote:
I would personally create an anoymous email account and send them
some
information stating that you are a penetration tester that
'happened'
upon a possible security flaw in their website, but because of the
state of fear that some unenlightened organisations have about this
type of situation, you wish to remain anonymous at this point. Then
explain that if they are open to increasing the security of their
website, you will gladly analyse the security flaw further and give
them full disclosure, on the basis that you will be given written
permission prior to continuing further.
I hardly think that "written permission" granted after what would be
received as an extortion attempt would be valid.
If you are really intent on helping the party that's insecure, then
the
only quasi-safe way to do it is to send an anonymous report that has
all
the details, shows them how to reproduce the issue themselves, and
urge
them to contact their local security experts to have this looked at.
The ONLY CHANCE of having your message being taken seriously is if
there
is no question about your motives, and the only way to attempt that is
to
remove yourself from the loop once you've sent off the report. That
means
no ongoing contact, no payment, no work. You leave it to them to fix.
Even this is no guarantee - the great majority of unsolicited security
reports is ignored even if presented clearly and with an unambiguous
message disclaiming any personal gain.
It's really just not worth the trouble.
Steve
---
Stephen J Friedl | Security Consultant | UNIX Wizard | +1 714
544-6561
www.unixwiz.net | Tustin, Calif. USA | Microsoft MVP |
steve@unixwiz.net
--
Lee J Lawson
leejlawson@gmail.com
"Give a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire,
and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
