Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Pen-Test
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects...

Subject: RE: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects...
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 05:50:50 +1000
Hello,
Where have you been.
"This written permission should not be an electronic copy, at least in the UK.  
UK law does not recognise electronic documentation,"
 
I take it you have not heard of either common law privity rules and their 
application or more specifically the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) 
Regulations 2002
 
Of course the UK recognised electronic documents! 
 
I suggest that you read Lord Denning in High Trees [1]. This goes all the way 
back to Telex and even somewhat earlier.
 
In fact, ALL common law juristictions recognise electronic documents. Not 
having codified legislation does not mean that these are not accepted. The 
weight may vary, but this is to be expected.
 
Regards,
Craig
 
[1] Central London Property Trust Ltd. v. High Trees House Ltd. (1947) p. 216
 



Craig Wright
Manager of Information Systems

Direct : +61 2 9286 5497
Craig.Wright@bdo.com.au
+61 417 683 914

BDO Kendalls (NSW)
Level 19, 2 Market Street Sydney NSW 2000
GPO BOX 2551 Sydney NSW 2001
Fax +61 2 9993 9497
www.bdo.com.au

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 
in respect of matters arising within those States and Territories of Australia 
where such legislation exists.

The information in this email and any attachments is confidential.  If you are 
not the named addressee you must not read, print, copy, distribute, or use in 
any way this transmission or any information it contains.  If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender by return email, destroy all 
copies and delete it from your system. 

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and not 
necessarily endorsed by BDO Kendalls.  You may not rely on this message as 
advice unless subsequently confirmed by fax or letter signed by a Partner or 
Director of BDO Kendalls.  It is your responsibility to scan this communication 
and any files attached for computer viruses and other defects.  BDO Kendalls 
does not accept liability for any loss or damage however caused which may 
result from this communication or any files attached.  A full version of the 
BDO Kendalls disclaimer, and our Privacy statement, can be found on the BDO 
Kendalls website at http://www.bdo.com.au or by emailing 
administrator@bdo.com.au.

BDO Kendalls is a national association of separate partnerships and entities.

________________________________


From: listbounce@securityfocus.com on behalf of Lee Lawson
Sent: Wed 30/05/2007 6:14 PM
To: James Wilburn
Cc: pen-test@securityfocus.com; security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects...



In terms of prior permission, you would need written permission by the
web site owners.  This written permission should not be an electronic
copy, at least in the UK.  UK law does not recognise electronic
documentation, such as e-mails, as a true representation of an
original document.  The original document in question is the owners
handwritten signature, that makes it a real agreement.

I would personally create an anoymous email account and send them some
information stating that you are a penetration tester that 'happened'
upon a possible security flaw in their website, but because of the
state of fear that some unenlightened organisations have about this
type of situation, you wish to remain anonymous at this point.  Then
explain that if they are open to increasing the security of their
website, you will gladly analyse the security flaw further and give
them full disclosure, on the basis that you will be given written
permission prior to continuing further.


2 cents - deposited.
On 5/30/07, James Wilburn <jwilburn@jameswilburn.com> wrote:
With the number of horror stories about disclosing vulnerabilities to large
companies, I would tread lightly.  If it was a small company or personal
website they would probably thank you, this is not the case with the larger
companies.

As far as legality, I don't know.  But I was always thought "testing some
websites as a personal research/leisure" without the owners permission can
land you in a world of hurt if they have a legal team.


-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On
Behalf Of Dark Cold Ice
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 5:12 PM
To: pen-test@securityfocus.com; security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects...

Hi all,

It was earlier today whilst testing some websites as a personal
research/leisure time that i found a quite critical bug in a major
computer related website which will not be disclosured until all the
legal aspects of the disclosure process itself are dealt with.
After detecting the aforementioned vulnerability i was, like many have
been before, "jailed" between the decisions of reporting it or not, it
didn't take me long to decide to report it to the vendor as the flaw
itself was on it's website... My first step and only one so far was to
write the vendor the typical "praxis" e-mail saying that there MIGHT
be a vulnerability SOMEWHERE on their website and that i would like
carte blanche to investigate a bit more about it. I am now stuck with
3 thoughts, first of all, if the answer is no ( most common perhaps)
the vendor will be losing its chance to know where and what flaw is
it... will i be stuck with that and not be able to publicize it to the
security community?
Second thought, if the vendor says yes, i will report them the
vulnerability but, what entitles me the right to do it legally... a
simple e-mail would be enough perhaps...
Third and last thought, if they indeed agree to give me the chance to
test and report them the vulnerability i will only be entitled to
publicize it once solved, but even then, will it be legal to make a
full disclosure?

Thank you all in advance,

Darkcoldice

PS: What would the difference be between the US and UK laws on that
final aspect?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!

http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!

http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------




--
Lee J Lawson
leejlawson@gmail.com

"Give a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire,
and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>