This is simple. You have NO rights to go looking for vulnerabilities on a web
site you do not control.
You can check your own systems all you like (excluding reverse engineering laws
in some jursitictions). You can NEVER check a site which you do not copntrol
without EXPLICT and EXPRESS permission legally.
"i would like carte blanche to investigate a bit more about it." Is just wrong.
You are not the authorised protector of the Web. You have no rights to do this.
To do otherwise is to be a vigilantee. People have the right to be insecure. As
an analogy, I can leave my house unlocked - it is my right to be insecure and
there is nothing you may do about it legally. After the fact this may (and
will) impact my insurance, but this is MY decision and you have no right to go
about checking my proverbial door.
If you think that you have a right - look at Mr Cuthbert last year [1]. Maybe
Mr Gray [2]. Even as Mr Cuthbert discovered, doing "../.." "testing" or
checking SQL input fields is illegal and usually criminal.
The laws in the US and UK differ in statute. The common law foundation of
property has deviated, but has a common basis. The law of license is such that
you never have a right in either place to do this. What varies is the penalty.
It will be a "simple" civil penalty in some places (ie you pay money) and a
criminal felony offense in others. Worse this may be International in that web
sites are rarely local to you and this makes it worse again.
Regards,
Craig
[1] R v Daniel Cuthbert {Horseferry Road Magistrates Court 07/10/2005} Computer
Misuse Act 1990, s 1 Unauthorised access
IT security consultant donated £30 to Disasters Emergency Committee Tsunami
appeal website, then "checked" site security. Defendant found guilty of
unauthorised access "with deep regret", convicted and fined £400.
[2] R v Raphael Gray {Swansea Crown Court 06/07/2001} Computer Misuse Act 1990
Unauthorised access - Unauthorised modification
Teenage hacker aka Curador demonstrated security weaknesses in e-commerce
web-sites and accessed 23,000 credit card records, some posted on his web-site.
Guilty plea. Defendant convicted and sentenced to three years probation and
medical treatment for obsessive mental disorder.
Craig Wright
Manager of Information Systems
Direct : +61 2 9286 5497
Craig.Wright@bdo.com.au
+61 417 683 914
BDO Kendalls (NSW)
Level 19, 2 Market Street Sydney NSW 2000
GPO BOX 2551 Sydney NSW 2001
Fax +61 2 9993 9497
www.bdo.com.au
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
in respect of matters arising within those States and Territories of Australia
where such legislation exists.
The information in this email and any attachments is confidential. If you are
not the named addressee you must not read, print, copy, distribute, or use in
any way this transmission or any information it contains. If you have received
this message in error, please notify the sender by return email, destroy all
copies and delete it from your system.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and not
necessarily endorsed by BDO Kendalls. You may not rely on this message as
advice unless subsequently confirmed by fax or letter signed by a Partner or
Director of BDO Kendalls. It is your responsibility to scan this communication
and any files attached for computer viruses and other defects. BDO Kendalls
does not accept liability for any loss or damage however caused which may
result from this communication or any files attached. A full version of the
BDO Kendalls disclaimer, and our Privacy statement, can be found on the BDO
Kendalls website at http://www.bdo.com.au or by emailing
administrator@bdo.com.au.
BDO Kendalls is a national association of separate partnerships and entities.
-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On
Behalf Of Dark Cold Ice
Sent: Wednesday, 30 May 2007 8:12 AM
To: pen-test@securityfocus.com; security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects...
Hi all,
It was earlier today whilst testing some websites as a personal
research/leisure time that i found a quite critical bug in a major
computer related website which will not be disclosured until all the
legal aspects of the disclosure process itself are dealt with.
After detecting the aforementioned vulnerability i was, like many have
been before, "jailed" between the decisions of reporting it or not, it
didn't take me long to decide to report it to the vendor as the flaw
itself was on it's website... My first step and only one so far was to
write the vendor the typical "praxis" e-mail saying that there MIGHT
be a vulnerability SOMEWHERE on their website and that i would like
carte blanche to investigate a bit more about it. I am now stuck with
3 thoughts, first of all, if the answer is no ( most common perhaps)
the vendor will be losing its chance to know where and what flaw is
it... will i be stuck with that and not be able to publicize it to the
security community?
Second thought, if the vendor says yes, i will report them the
vulnerability but, what entitles me the right to do it legally... a
simple e-mail would be enough perhaps...
Third and last thought, if they indeed agree to give me the chance to
test and report them the vulnerability i will only be entitled to
publicize it once solved, but even then, will it be legal to make a
full disclosure?
Thank you all in advance,
Darkcoldice
PS: What would the difference be between the US and UK laws on that
final aspect?
