Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Unix Application, |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 21 May 2007 20:09:59 +1000 |
Dear all, On my recent pen test, I have seen on Unix Apps (written in C) relies on UNIX authentication (/etc/passwd and /etc/group) to determine which functionalities the user can access to. 1) My first question would be what is the rationale of having such design? Obviously the authentication design is open to not only the application users but to the operating system users. 2) I know on some Unix/Linux flavors, the system could enforce the user to change their password every X days. If I am not wrong this setting can be set through "/etc/shadow" but what if the user never accesses their Shell? Would it still enforce the user to change their password? (say on /etc/passwd; username .......: :::::: /bin/apps - instead of /bin/sh) - so when the user is actually connect to the terminal, its automatically run the application and not a shell - if I am not wrong .Profile is run after /bin/sh is called? Cheers, John, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat? Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic See HOW Now with our 20/20 program! http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Legality of WEP Cracking, Justin Ferguson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Legality of WEP Cracking, Larry Offley |
| Previous by Thread: | Wireless penetration testing, spencerforhire |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Unix Application,, Pranay Kanwar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |