richard keep us posted with wht u decide then.
On 5/19/07, Richard Brinson <richard@kanoo-uk.com> wrote:
Nice to read all of your thoughts on this matter. I personally have little
doubt that this would be an unethical way to conduct business and is
certainly not the best way forward (hence my "moral issues aside" comment in
the original mail). What I am interested in is educating my engineers to be
able to support our sales guys in the best possible fashion. We are based in
the UK and the attitude to litigation here is relatively passive compared to
that in the US, and it is with this in mind that our sales guys sometimes
think they can 'stretch' the boundaries a bit.
I totally agree that as an ethical security company, grey areas should be
viewed as black. I will be going over all of these comments in our next bus
dev meeting to highlight the general feeling of the industry from a
technical aspect. No doubt our sales guys will think it is somewhat biased.
Keep the opinions coming...
Regards
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Shea [mailto:tim@tshea.net]
Sent: 18 May 2007 21:06
To: crazy frog crazy frog
Cc: Shenk, Jerry A; Richard Brinson; pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Legality of WEP Cracking
Agreed - but here is another way to look at it:
If you go after business this way - you are guaranteed that your competitors
will get the gig and not you. You will just be thrown out.
I've gotten two gigs to tighten down networks in the last 6 months due to
someone else trying this approach to "educate" and "build business".
Finally, you can argue all you want on the legalities (since the laws are
all over the map) but, IMHO, its unethical.
> interesting but i doubt it will give you good impression? can you
> imagine that someone has broken your wep , he comes to you and say
> "look what we have broken your wep,now we can offer you our services
> to secure your networks"
>
> will you accept his service?don't you think its illegal?
> ---------------------------------------
> http://www.secgeeks.com
> get a blog on SecGeeks :)
> register here:-
> http://secgeeks.com/user/register
> rss feeds :-
> http://secgeeks.com/node/feed
>
> http://www.newskicks.com
> Submit and kick for new stories from all around the world.
> ---------------------------------------
>
> On 5/19/07, Shenk, Jerry A <jshenk@decommunications.com> wrote:
>> I think the specific frequencies that wifi uses are public
>> frequencies without "an expectation of privacy". I'm not sure that's
>> a good way to pick up customers and I'm not volunteering to be a test
>> case but I think there is some validity to that conclusion. Now,
>> what you do with the data could become an issue and whether you are
>> breaking the law or not, they "offended company" could make your life
>> MISERABLE and cost you TON of money. I'd be eager to watch somebody
>> else fight that battle and see what happens;)
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: listbounce@securityfocus.com
>> [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com]
>> On Behalf Of Richard Brinson
>> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 5:32 AM
>> To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
>> Subject: Legality of WEP Cracking
>>
>> During an internal business development meeting yesterday we were
>> discussing new ways of picking up pen testing clients. One of our
>> junior engineers suggested that we go war driving, crack some WEP
>> keys and then approach each company offering services to make them
>> more secure. The idea was put down straight away on the basis that
>> without prior approval we would be breaking the law. However, upon
>> further discussion a case was made that (moral issues
>> aside) provided we only captured traffic passively, and as long as we
>> did not try to connect or send any packets to any devices - would the
>> law be broken?
>>
>> Does the law state anywhere that we can not analyse air traffic that
>> is broadcast into the public domain? (if so surely we would all be
>> breaking the law every time we picked up a network other than our
>> own) and is it against the law to know someone else's WEP key when
>> they have not made that information available to you?
>>
>> What are your thoughts on this?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Richard Brinson
>> Kanoo Ltd
>>
>> This message contains confidential information and is intended only
>> for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
>> should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify
>> the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by
>> mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission
>> cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could
>> be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or
>> incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
>> liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
>> message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
>>
>> Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
>> Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
>> See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
>>
>> http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> **DISCLAIMER
>> This e-mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended for
>> the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed and may
>> contain information that is privileged, proprietary and confidential. If
>> you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to
>> anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you
>> have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and
>> delete this e-mail message. The contents do not represent the opinion of
>> D&E except to the extent that it relates to their official business.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
>>
>> Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
>> Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
>> See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
>>
>> http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
>
> Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
> Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
> See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
>
> http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.3/809 - Release Date: 17/05/2007
17:18
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.3/809 - Release Date: 17/05/2007
17:18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
---------------------------------------
http://www.secgeeks.com
get a blog on SecGeeks :)
register here:-
http://secgeeks.com/user/register
rss feeds :-
http://secradar.com/node/feed
http://www.newskicks.com
Submit and kick for new stories from all around the world.
---------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
