Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Pen-Test
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: Sneaking a peek on Wlan in airports

Subject: Re: Re: Sneaking a peek on Wlan in airports
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 10:28:59 -0400
ROFL, that is exactly what I was thinking.

This is a sticky situation really.

Jason,

I have not always agreed with the idea that this is intercepting communications.

If you were to do an arp poisoning or someother MITM ;) attack, then
yes i agree that that is intercepting.

But if you are in promiscuous mode wirelessly, that is kind of like
over hearing a conversation happening in an elevator.

I know that may not stand up in court, but I have always thought that.

Now with that being said, to run some HIDS on you wireless connection
is almost the same right?

So, to protect my self I run in promiscuous mode and I have to evalute
the traffic that is broadcasting and being received by my NIC. I
didn't ask for the traffic to touch my NIC, but it does. So, now a
flase positive is triggered and packets are logged. Not that false
positives ever happen ;-). So am I now in trouble because I picked up
some SMB traffic and it was inaccurately logged and maybe I logged a
sensitive file being transfered?

Maybe I am just a wacko..lol

But this is a fun topic.

-kill

On 5/17/07, alan <alan@clueserver.org> wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007, ebk_lists@hotmail.com wrote:

> I agree wholeheartedly with this view.
>
> Not much else to say!
>
> If you really feel it is necessary, than trying to advise the person/company 
of the issue anonymously is an option. Depending on the nature and severity of the 
issue.

Maybe the airport needs a "Wall of Sheep".

--
"ANSI C says access to the padding fields of a struct is undefined.
ANSI C also says that struct assignment is a memcpy. Therefore struct
assignment in ANSI C is a violation of ANSI C..."
                                  - Alan Cox

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!

http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------




--
If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked.
What's more, you deserve to be hacked.
-- former White House cybersecurity czar Richard Clarke

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!

http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>