Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Testing the user community |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:20:37 -0800 |
That's the real point-- while there are probably some good things that may come of it (the "active user education" adaptation Gadi spoke of) there are far too many things that could (and often will) go wrong. And like I said before, even if things "go right" it is not a valid metric for success. My users know that I will never send them an executable attachment. Ever. That is "good education" for them. If I were to engage in some internal "test" of that by actually sending out executable code or mock viruses, it will only serve to confuse them. I can see someone actually opening a virus thinking it was a "test" of some sort just to see what it would do. It just seems like a colossal waste of time when what an admin should be doing is ensuring all users are not local admins, that decent antivirus/malware applications are in place, that gateway/firewall products are properly configured, and that you educate users in a positive manner with proactive methods and not after-the-fact "bad dog" positioning. That's what results in effective, robust security. t On 2/6/07 3:54 AM, "M.B.Jr." <marcio.barbado@gmail.com> spoketh to all:
actually, this aint new stuff. last year, London's financial district faced something similar: http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=147 ... with some scary results. On 2/3/07, Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> wrote:On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:Not withstanding the value of the other replies, the problem with this method is that the outcome doesn't really prove anything one way or the other. If he sends a mock virus out and no one opens it, it doesn't mean that they won't open a real one that comes out the next day. If they do open his, that doesn't mean they'll actually open a real one in the future. You can always prove that your users will do something stupid. That's trivial. If the goal is to actually improve the security posture of your userbase, then engage in continued user education - not waste your time trying to get them to open a virus.Look at it as "active user education". If you find out who always opens the attachments, or educate more and more between different such "learning attacks", it is worth it. It's up to the organization to choose doing it, and just once is pointless.t On 2/1/07 6:55 AM, "Schanulleke" <schalulleke@gmail.com> spoketh to all:webmaster@absolutenetworks.biz wrote:We all know our weak link but how do you identify just how weak they are? I think it's time to pen test my user community and have a couple ideas to gather statistics on just how nonaware they really are.What is the point you are trying to make, what is the goal you are trying to achieve?Maybe a simple phishing scam and bogus email with a fake virus attachment that emails me when it's opened so I can track how many folks actually opened it. Has anyone ever done this before? I can't find any information about it on the web.. thoughts and ideas anybody?It all has been done before for real. THere are plenty of real examples out there. If you have AV check how often it is triggered. Or are you really trying to prove that your users at 1d10ts? Frank ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=7016000 000 08bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=70160000 0008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000 008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Testing the user community, M.B.Jr. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Testing the user community, Don Turnblade |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Testing the user community, R. DuFresne |
| Next by Thread: | PHP Security from the Inside, Erin Carroll |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |