Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | VPN Server |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:34:53 -0800 (PST) |
Hi, I was pentesting a VPN server and could make an aggressive mode connection. The vulnerability associated with VPN Servers is a group enumeration vulnerability referred as below: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2284/products_security_notice09186a00804a7912.html Now with the IKE Scan tool , I get the following response frm the vpn server using random ID= values for the group. However even though the results say its a vpn concentrator its actuall a cisco pix fw implementing a vpn server, which is fine just a fingerprinting flaw. On further digging it was found that the vpn server is at proper pacth levels and does not have any groups configured. However according to vuln description , following handshake to the aggressive mode should not be returned, and as one can see the returned handshake is successful. So i was wondering is having Aggressive mode configured is a problem here ? Do we recommend disabling agressive mode , if yes what could be the problem. Since no groups are configured , does it boil down to being a problem of fingerprinting the product used for vpn server? As it seems it responds to below message for everything used. thanks! my-powerbook-g4-15:~/tools/ike-scan-1.8 $layer$ sudo ./ike-scan -A --idtype=11 -M --auth=65001 --id=tom x.x.x.70 Starting ike-scan 1.8 with 1 hosts ( http://www.nta-monitor.com/ike-scan/) x.x.x.70 Aggressive Mode Handshake returned HDR=(CKY-R=34b668433f0520cf) SA=(Enc=3DES Hash=MD5 Group=2:modp1024 Auth=XAUTH LifeType=Seconds LifeDuration=28800) KeyExchange(128 bytes) Nonce(20 bytes) ID(Type=ID_IPV4_ADDR, Value=x.x.x.70) Hash(16 bytes) VID=12f5f28c457168a9702d9fe274cc0100 (Cisco Unity) VID=09002689dfd6b712 (XAUTH) VID=4048b7d56ebce88525e7de7f00d6c2d3c0000000 (IKE Fragmentation) VID=1f07f70eaa6514d3b0fa96542a500100 (Cisco VPN Concentrator) Ending ike-scan 1.8: 1 hosts scanned in 0.786 seconds (1.27 hosts/sec). 1 returned handshake; 0 returned notify ____________________________________________________________________________________ Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index ____________________________________________________________________________________ Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: VPN Server, Dario Ciccarone (dciccaro) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Privacy of ISP's customers, Javier Fernández-Sanguino |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: VPN Server, Dario Ciccarone (dciccaro) |
| Next by Thread: | Fwd: Rainbow Help, g33kfu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |