Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: RE Traceroute question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:44:23 +0530 |
I have noticed it many times on Juniper routers also when we are using subinterfaces. As the way traceroute work I guess it is due to dual response from the destination hop which returns twice to the sender and on the basis of ICMP ttl expired error sender shows it twice. Also if we note it keenly the MS value in both the responses varies from each other. The second response shows little bit more milli seconds hence I am guessing that the returning HOP gives one response of TTL expired immedietely at main interface and one might be coming from sub interface or any such mechanisum which also get chance to process same packet hence there is some dely in second packet. Hope my assumptions are right. Datta Vaidya ----- Original Message ----- From: "Francois Labreque" <flabreq@ca.ibm.com> To: "Becky Nelson" <ralf.jacober@gmail.com> Cc: <listbounce@securityfocus.com>; <pen-test@securityfocus.com> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 8:18 PM Subject: RE Traceroute question listbounce@securityfocus.com a écrit sur 2006-12-27 20:36:58 :
I am running a traceroute and have two hops that report the same address. Could someone please explain what would cause this? I suspect that this is some type of firewall? Regards, Ralf
It can be a firewall that does PAT, or it can be certain models of higher end Cisco routers (75xx series) that will do that if they have distributed-forwarding turned on.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Virtual environments security, Michel Pereira |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Virtual environments security, Michel Pereira |
| Previous by Thread: | RE Traceroute question, Francois Labreque |
| Next by Thread: | re: Traceroute question, Robert MacDonald |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |