Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: CISSP |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:20:36 +0100 |
But I also think certification by itself means next to nothing for the most part. I have seen way to many Consultants with certifications and degrees not know their head from a hole in the ground.
There are certifications and there are certifications. Knowledge certifications where one memorizes security trivia and regurgitates it on an exam has much less applicability in the real world than a formal education where case studies and experience may be introduced or an applied knowledge certification. But a certification should mean something. It should prove that a person can apply a particular type of knowledge, a specialty, with a measurable degree of accuracy and efficiency. If a group has convinced you that they can certify, accredit, or graduate you in a trade or specialty in a manner which requires no proof of skill then you should question your own critical thinking skills. Because it just doesn't work that way. Even with experience, that means nothing if what you learned is wrong from the start. The US Department of Education has a word for organizations who sell diplomas for experience alone and often no additional coursework: Diploma Mills (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diploma_mills). I'm saying this because at ISECOM we have been an authority for applied knowledge security certifications for nearly 5 years because the security community we work with asked for it. They asked for a security cert that didn't suck. They wanted one where people actually had to apply their knowledge of testing and analysis with accuracy and efficiency in order to pass an exam against a live network. So we built it and you know what, we still sometimes get complaints that it's too hard and too complicated. When we first rolled this out in the US, the training organization we worked with didn't see a future for it because they said they needed an easier exam, a knowledge-based one, so people can pass and take a certification back to the office which will bring in more people. Then they can also promote a high pass rate in their marketing for that training. So we stopped working with those training companies in the U.S. that wanted an easy pass to sell easily to the masses. But that's just mainly a problem in the US and most other regions have been just fine for us. In those other places the ISECOM certifications really mean something and get people employed and advanced and vetted for having them. So please don't lump all security certifications together. Some of us are working hard to help and such comments don't. Sincerely, -pete. PS: Sure I work for ISECOM so I am biased about the quality of our certifications but facts are facts and our certifications really are applied knowledge, hands-on examinations. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Loading EXE files directly from memory?, Krugger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Full-disclosure] Call For Papers: SecurityOPUS 2007, Sharkey |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: RE: CISSP, Bates, Chris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: CISSP, Joseph McCray |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |