Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Layer 3 and Firewall |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:08:05 -0400 |
A Not So Related topic... Has anyone here actually used VLAN hopping in a pen-test. Although I've played with it in a lab I've never actually done in an audit as (at least for me) I found it HEAVILY dependent upon terrible switch configuration. The .mil/.gov networks that I used to audit had fairly decent configuration management so disabled VLAN1, blah blah blah... On networks that didn't have all of that configuration management on the infrastructure I'd have domain admin way before I even got close to something like that. Also another concern is these enterprise multi-layer switches - like we had 4 6509 switches with redundant paths out. I just can't see doing that kind of stuff and risking taking down the ENTIRE network. What do you guyz think? Joe On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 14:14 -0400, Paul Melson wrote:
-----Original Message----- Subject: Layer 3 and FirewallIs it a BAD idea to have multiple logical segments of a Firewall connectedto the same physical switch? It's not a good standard to adhere to because layer-2 VLANs can be hopped in some cases by attacking the switch, but the level and type of vulnerability will vary by implementation. In fact, Check Point is designed so that you can have multiple virtual interfaces on a single physical port by using 802.1q VLAN tagging.The threat I see is if the network switch administrator wants to bypassFirewall, he can just disconnectthe Firewall links and make the VLANs Layer 3 and there is no security.After malicious activites he canvery well connect the Firewall and revert back to Layer 2.This is a separate issue. If the switch admin is not in sync with the firewall admin or cannot be trusted, then 1) yes this is a valid threat and 2) while a technical solution exists, the best solution to this specific issue is to address these problems from a personnel perspective and either reassign responsibility for those switches or replace the switch admin with someone who is trustworthy.Is that a valid threat ? Is it High risk ? What controls are possible ?Are multiple physical switchesrequired.?Probably the thing to do would be to research whether or not a workstation on either VLAN can hop to the other with the current switch configuration. You're going to want yersinia, Cain, arptools and another Cisco switch (a 2950 is fine for this) and see if you can flood or spoof your way to the other VLAN. This is best done during a maintenance window or some time when it's OK to disrupt the network. PaulM ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Joe McCray Toll Free: 1-866-892-2132 Email: joe@learnsecurityonline.com Web: https://www.learnsecurityonline.com Learn Security Online, Inc. * Security Games * Simulators * Challenge Servers * Courses * Hacking Competitions * Hacklab Access
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Ps. Informing Companies about security vulnerabilities..., Craig Wright |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Informing Companies about security vulnerabilities.., Dragos Ruiu |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Layer 3 and Firewall, Paul Melson |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Layer 3 and Firewall, Paul Melson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |