Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Bluetooth Wireless Keyboards |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:50:28 -0700 |
Recently we have discovered that one of the employees in our organization has purchased a bluetooth keyboard. Their belief is that if someone were to sniff their keystrokes they would have to be within 30 feet.
Most consumer-grade devices would have difficulty pulling in a coherent signal at 30 feet. On that point, the user is mildly correct. However, it is not terribly difficult to find Bluetooth devices with external antennas and correspondingly greater range, and anyone with a little bit of skill can modify an existing device to allow for tremendous ranges, as shown here:
http://www.pentest.co.uk/documents/bt_dongle_mod/bt_dongle_mod.html
Based on what I saw at Black Hat I am a little less paranoid since the vendor could be doing something to protect the keystrokes and BT is somewhat of a strange protocol anyway. I guess I'll never really know till I go out there with my own BT dongle and capture some traffic myself, if possible. ;)
In a presentation on Bluetooth in March 2006, Joshua Wright (developer of asleap and some other useful tools) demonstrated a technique he called Bluepinning. It was able to crack the PIN used to secure a connection between Bluetooth devices with astounding ease; as I recall, a six-digit PIN was broken live in about three minutes on an 800MHz P3 notebook, and it scales at a factor of 10 per digit, i.e., a seven-digit PIN would take about 30 minutes, an eight-digit PIN about five hours, etc. How often is the PIN changed in *your* Bluetooth devices? More importantly, on which Bluetooth devices are you even *able* to change the PIN from its factory setting?
The exploit remains in private hands, but there's no telling whether someone has been able to duplicate the method. This, along with several other aspects of Bluetooth, has made me disable it on everything that I am assigned at work, and avoid purchasing it wherever possible, except for additional devices intended to be used for captures and analysis.
Bluetooth is, IMHO, marginally more secure than some of the old wireless keyboards, but I wouldn't put one on my desk without a significant alteration in how encryption is handled. According to Joshua, Bluetooth had a design goal of radios that cost $5 to make them more attractive to consumers by way of lower cost. Just how much encryption can you cram in a $5 radio?
---- Jarrod Frates GAWN
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RE: cracking Y2k DC Admin password, philippe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Bluetooth Wireless Keyboards, Kevin white |
| Previous by Thread: | Bluetooth Wireless Keyboards, Kevin white |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bluetooth Wireless Keyboards, Kevin white |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |