Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Full-disclosure] CC evaluation |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:32:22 +0200 |
Hi all,
Could you please give your comments on the following point:
"CC is an evaluation of design methods, not an evaluation of security functionality. It is the system development process that is being evaluated, not the system itself. This means that the given EAL only states whether a larger enough pile of paperwork over the design process exists or not. The correctness and importance of those papers doase not even have to be verified and examined".
Thanks for your helps, Nguyen Pham.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: C# Exceptions, 3 shool |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Full-disclosure] CC evaluation, Clement Dupuis |
| Previous by Thread: | C# Exceptions, 3 shool |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Full-disclosure] CC evaluation, Clement Dupuis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |