Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: MAC address spoofing - conflict? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:13:56 +0100 |
Hi Lubos,
So this means, both stations get the comm's.
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Mike
Yes, but what will happen then? Data will be sent to that MAC address.
If it is switched network, I can imagine the switch will maybe send it to the correct port from which the response came?
If there is a hub though, the packet will be delivered to which network card?
Lubos Kolouch
Le mercredi 16 aoÃt 2006 Ã 10:26 +0200, Lubos Kolouch a Ãcrit : > I think it does matter. Because there will be more than host replying to > ARP broadcasts and the question is what will happen.
Nope it does not matter, because you won't have multiple answers...
ARP asks for an _IP_ address, not a MAC one. Therefore, if MAC addresses are identical, but IP addresses are different, an ARP request for one given IP address will get one answer only. In the end, you will end up with two entries in ARP cache with the same MAC address, but there's not problem out there.
And if, in case of some wierd and unexplained behaviour (aka awful bug), both hosts were replying, they would reply with the same MAC address to the same request, so you would not have problem either.
Le jeudi 17 aoÃt 2006 Ã 01:03 +0000, penetrationtestmail@gmail.com a Ãcrit : > And if anyone knows the exact answer, that would be most helpful ;)
The exact answer is: you can seamless spoof MAC addresses on WLAN as long as you use a different IP address than spoofed host, so you don't have TCP RST problems and stuff like this. Tested in lab and real life for pentests.
It's a classical technic (among others[1]) for bypassing some cheap, but still widespread, WLAN captive portal that only track authenticated clients with their MAC address.
[1] http://sid.rstack.org/pres/0602_ESW_CaptiveBypass.pdf
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Previous by Date: | Re: MAC address spoofing - conflict?, Gavin White |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MAC address spoofing - conflict?, dogten |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MAC address spoofing - conflict?, Lubos Kolouch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MAC address spoofing - conflict?, dogten |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |