Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Clueless firewall configuration ? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 12 Aug 2006 08:55:42 -0500 |
A few problems I see with this:
1. Having untrusted traffic on your core switch can cause the potential for a remote DoS attack against your core. Switches have been known to keel over under certain circumstances (the Slammer worm was one) where there are lots of small packets on the wire.
2. VLAN hopping attacks. A misconfiguration may make it possible to inject untrusted traffic onto your trusted network by spoofing VLAN headers. A method for bi-directional traffic was recently posted (sorry, I don't have the ref handy) by using a publically addressable host.
3. Everyone makes mistakes. By combining untrusted and trusted networks on a single switch, the effects of a configuration mistake could be amplified.
4. Cisco, in my opinion, isn't the best or most secure firewall available.
5. Collapsing the network to that level might make it harder to monitor and control. For example, how would you put a network based IPS between the firewall and the internal segment if you wanted to impliment one in the future?
Hope this helps,
Chris www.riosec.com
Guys, I need to ask a favor, my boss knows nothing of IT infrastructure, and our "cableguy" (manages the firewall through a third party contract) proposed to him an architecture as follows :
2 cisco 6509 each with firewall blade in them. These function as core switches for a 1000 users site with lots of vlans and FW roules between the vlans (oh and we are a big production site that relies on these cores to let our ciritical bussiness process machines communicate to the servers).
He wants to create 2 vlans, 1 for untrusted traffic and 1 vlan for DMZ machines and assign physical ports to these to connect to the internet. The DMZ vlan would also have some physical ports. These ports would not be on the core switch but on the access layer switches that are fiber attached to the distribution switches that attach to the cores...
Does anyone care to comment on the security issues a setup as this would pose? would this be pentest bonanza for you guys? and what would the hackers make of a dmz vlan living in a big switch together with other vlans?
I have some ideas myself, but would appreciate your take on this. I know this is the pentest list but it is you guys who get to poke holes in these designs...
CCG
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Clueless firewall configuration ?, s-williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Clueless firewall configuration ?, John Kinsella |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Clueless firewall configuration ?, John Kinsella |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Clueless firewall configuration ?, John Kinsella |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |