Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Clueless firewall configuration ? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:13:18 -0700 |
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:08:09PM +0200, cableguy clueless wrote:
2 cisco 6509 each with firewall blade in them. These function as core switches for a 1000 users site with lots of vlans and FW roules between the vlans (oh and we are a big production site that relies on these cores to let our ciritical bussiness process machines communicate to the servers). He wants to create 2 vlans, 1 for untrusted traffic and 1 vlan for DMZ machines and assign physical ports to these to connect to the internet. The DMZ vlan would also have some physical ports. These ports would not be on the core switch but on the access layer switches that are fiber attached to the distribution switches that attach to the cores...
I actually architected something vaguely similar for a large retailer last year, although there were about 50 vlans total and several other layers of security as well (edge filtering egres/ingres, separate vendor and employee vpns, etc). So with that background, I'll comment a bit: Looking just at the vlan part, there is in theory the ability to "jump" vlans (well covered topic on securityfocus lists). I would probably consider spitting the DMZs off before they hit the cats, either routed to a different port on the edge devices, or a firewall (different brand might be of interest, depeding on paranoia) sitting in front of the cats. Depends on value of the rest of the network and it's contents. Tradeoff here is more hardware to purchase, architect, manage, and more potential points of failure. Looking at it from a DOS point of view, if there is significant traffic levels flowing through the switches, the designer must be aware of design details such as how many ports per ASIC and backplane bandwidth for the supervisor card being used. Otherwise packets can be dropped under heavy enough loads (I've seen that at a different site, it was ugly and cost millions in revenue - not my design :) ). Hopefully the cores have been hardened, telnet turned off, real passwords set, good versions of IOS, etc. I'd say the easiest attacks against those devices would be if the operational aspects haven't been well executed. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Clueless firewall configuration ?, Chris Byrd |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Clueless firewall configuration ?, John Kinsella |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Clueless firewall configuration ?, John Kinsella |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Clueless firewall configuration ?, PC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |