Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:59:16 +1200 |
H'mmm... I've formed my own view over the years...and before I get flamed this is a gross generalisation: Security Scan ... Run nessus / nmap / internet scanner / retina and produce report. Vulnerability Assessment ... Run nessus / nmap / internet scanner / retina , add a bit of test around a few of the vulnerabilities to beef up report and produce report. Security Audit ... Examine the process and configuration and ensure compliance with documented process / configuration. Incl. Standards, etc where documented ie 17799. Ignore how it can be abused. Penetration Test ... Do a partial VA (generally external, not internal) as prep and then exploit a couple of the vulnerabilites found to prove, sometimes with a token 'we got this' Security Assessment ... Comprehensive end to end test encompassing physical through to human (OSI layer 1 to 7 plus human 8 )
From these what we generally are missing is that these need to be done with
a good understanding of the business and its operational requirements, generally this is missed and the results are largely un-aligned with the business, risk management and governance. As an industry this is what we need to improve. We also have the problem of the testing being done at large intervals and this tends to lend a false sense of security. With the way things are going this is a waste of time/money for the organisation that would be better spent in ensuring continuous validation of the environment. Ie tracking/managing the operational security and dealing with weaknesses as they occur. What we are seeing with SoX, etc is a pressure to get this to a more 'real time' state. Saying that I do believe that a 3rd party assessment is still required but needs to be more aligned with the business , its risk management and internal/continous testing and this is where the Enterprise Security Architecture should come in. When I get to the stage where the OSSTMM covers both internal and external testing, a continuos cycle plus relevant metrics ...i'll be happy I've a got a "Security Assessment" that has long term worth for the business spending money. Just an opinion :-)
-----Original Message----- From: Christine Kronberg [mailto:seeker@shalla.de] Sent: 07 August 2006 04:54 To: Arkem Paul Cc: pen-test@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Arkem Paul wrote:A Vulnerability Assessment should be a comprehensive lookfrom policyand procedures to implementation of security in the networkand shouldinclude such things as patch management, virus protection, user education, SOE hardening, infrastructure configuration, etc.So basicly an assessment is equal to an audit? The description above is what I usually expect from someone doing an audit. A vulnerability assessment I tend to understand in terms of investigating a specific application (in far more detail than a penetration test). There are a couple of term mixed every now and again (like someone else just stated: funny that we professionals don't come up with _one_ definition): Audit Security Scan Security Assessment Vulnerability Assessment Penetration Test Did I miss one? Cheers, Christine Kronberg. -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details. -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/410 - Release Date: 05/08/2006
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Previous by Date: | RE: what are the top 5 usual suspects?, terry |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest, Omar A. Herrera |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest, Christine Kronberg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest, xelerated |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |