Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: rules of engagement scope |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 21 May 2006 09:45:16 +0200 |
I understand that rules of engagment are/should be required if only a specific item/prorocol is being tested, as with any software testing plan, but for a general penetration test I cannot understand why rules are set for engagement. since when do blackhat hackers and crackers abide by rules?On Sat, 13 May 2006, James Kelly wrote:
I'd be curious to find out what the typical scoping is for a pen test rules of engagement agreement.
Do folks go with a "anything goes" or "no holds barred" approach? What limits on ROE do people normally see in these types of agreements?
Take a look at ISECOM's OSSTMM 2.1 Rules of Engagement:
http://www.isecom.org/projects/rules.shtml
Someone here mentioned Denial of Service testing, speaking of which:
"6. Distributed Denial of Service testing over the Internet is forbidden." "7. Any form of flood testing where a person, network, system, or service, is overwhelmed from a larger and stronger source is forbidden."
Cheers,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | BlueSnarfing & Bluetooth Pentest, Anonymous |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff, Robin Wood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: rules of engagement scope (DoS testing), Martin Mačok |
| Next by Thread: | Re: rules of engagement scope, mr . nasty |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |