Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: how an hacker can bypass a chrooted environement ? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 18 May 2006 17:10:42 -0500 |
There was a specific vulnerability in VMWare a while back that exploited the NAT process to break out of the VM and execute code in the host system. You can find information about it in the CERT advisory here: http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/856689
Although this specific vulnerability has been patched, it illustrates that the virtualization is not perfect. Sharing hardware resources through software has both performance and security negative implications. As you probably know for x86 systems, hardware virtualization is a new concept, and only exists today in processors. AMD has released specifications for I/O virtualization, but I don't know of any chipsets have been released that support it.
Of course the mainframe folks get a kick out of all of this, as they've had real hardware virtualization (LPARs) for a long time now.
- Chris Byrd www.riosec.com
All this talk about chroot makes me wonder about xen or vmware...anyone have any thoughts/comments on breaking out of a virtual operating system?
-----Original Message----- From: "Marco Ivaldi" <raptor@0xdeadbeef.info> To: pen-test@securityfocus.com Sent: 5/16/06 8:36 AM Subject: Re: how an hacker can bypass a chrooted environement ?
Hey pen-test,
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Rob wrote:
> from man 2 chroot(): > > -- Note that this call does not change the current working directory, so > that '.' can be outside the tree rooted at '/'. In particular, the > super-user can escape from a 'chroot jail' by doing 'mkdir foo; chroot > foo; cd ..'. -- > > Also, mknod() some device files like /dev/kmem or /dev/hda1, then use > root priviledges to muck with kernel, or raw write data to disk.
Beside the already described techniques, here follows a quick summary of some other rather old tricks to break out of the chroot jail:
1) Load a kernel module;) Capability needed: CAP_SYS_MODULE.
2) Speaking about the already mentioned mknod() technique (capability needed: CAP_MKNOD), you could also use it to abuse ttys and virtual file systems through the mount() syscall (capability needed: CAP_SYS_ADMIN): procfs, devfs, devpts.
3) Inject code through ptrace() into a process outside the chroot jail, provided you meet the required conditions to do so. This could work for instance when the uid nobody is shared between several processes (semi-common misconfiguration). Depending on the situation, this could also be accomplished even with uid != 0. For further details, see also:
http://www.phrack.org/phrack/59/p59-0x0c.txt
4) Other uid != 0 tricks: (UNIX) sockets, shared memory segments and other IPCs, exploiting local kernel vulnerabilities;), some other application specific points.
5) Abuse sysctl() to set the modprobe binary path? Direct access to I/O ports? Sniff network traffic? Impersonate a local administration service (sshd)? Change netfilter rules? And so on... (you need different capabilities for those).
I'm sure i left some possibilities out (use your fantasy), but i guess this pretty much shows how you shouldn't blindly rely only on chroot to secure your servers. YMMV.
Cheers,
-- Marco Ivaldi Antifork Research, Inc. http://0xdeadbeef.info/ 3B05 C9C5 A2DE C3D7 4233 0394 EF85 2008 DBFD B707
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Download Core Impact, diegospahn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: rules of engagement scope (DoS testing), Craig Wright |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: how an hacker can bypass a chrooted environement ?, David M. Zendzian |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RE: how an hacker can bypass a chrooted environement ?, john . fellers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |