Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Pen-Test
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: rules of engagement scope

Subject: RE: rules of engagement scope
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:34:20 -0500
Realizing it's just an opinion you've offered, you need to 
normalize that opinion with reality. The scope limits on
pen tests have their origin in the Availability 'head' of the 
CIA triumvirate, and the liabilities associated when the
tested object is connected to systems over which the contracted
party has no direct responsibility (for example).

It ain't fraud... it's just common sense. 

-----Original Message-----
From: mr.nasty@ix.netcom.com [mailto:mr.nasty@ix.netcom.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 2:33 PM
To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: rules of engagement scope

Rules of Engagement Scope is as absurd as legally shredding 
audit papers.  Let me give you an example.  Pen-Tests are 
usually performed after a vulnerability test, which is done 
to support a financial audit, which is used to provide 
shareholders definite information regarding the stability of 
an organization.  If an organization requires a limited scope 
pen-test without disclosure wouldn't this constitute as a 
lie? Think about this just for a second. If you sign a 
Government form and there are mistakes on the form then you 
can be charged with FRAUD.  So if an organization establishes 
'ROE' that sets a limited scope on the pen-test without 
public disclosure, why is that different than FRAUD?  
National Security?  MHO is that pen-tests are as important as 
the certified financial statements used by organizations and 
should have public disclaimers of ROE.  When an organization 
is audited with certain constraints that information is or 
should be disclosed within those statements.  Information 
that is not disclosed regarding these limitations to me is 
considered FRAUD!  But then, that's just my opinion I could 
be monitored, jailed, fined and detained.


[snip the ad]

-

StyleWar



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Concerned about Web Application Security? 
Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's 
Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, 
you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the 
most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration 
testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a 
managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software 
(Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can 
help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php 
And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your 
results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>