Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Pentester convicted.. |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 11 May 2006 17:41:21 -0400 |
"Art Cooper" <acooper@pop.innerwall.com> wrote on 05/11/2006 11:25:57 AM:
I agree Bill. The fact they use information HE provided to then convict
him
is completely ridiculous..
If he actually did provide the information to USC that would be one thing. But he breaks in, steals personal records, doesn't notify USC about the security problem, and sends the personal records to a reporter!?? from http://www.wired.com/news/columns/circuitcourt/0,70857-0.html?tw=wn_index_6 "McCarty is a professional computer security consultant who noticed that there was a problem with the way the University of Southern California had constructed its web page for online applications. A database programming error allowed outsiders to obtain applicants' personal information, including Social Security numbers. For proof, the man copied seven applicants' personal records and anonymously sent them to a reporter for SecurityFocus. The journalist notified the school, the school fixed the problem, and the reporter wrote an article about it." Why would anyone try to defend this behavior much less get upset when he's prosecuted? Lee
On Wed, 10 May 2006 09:20:22 -0500, William Hancock wroteHey there pen-testers, take this with a grain of salt, it just got me excited. I am really interested in everyones opinion on the matter or corporate responsibility and ownership. <RANT> In an article posted to slashdot today (http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/10/112259&from=rss) a man has been convicted of hacking when he casually and helpfully reported a security vulnerability to the owners of a web site, in this case The University of Southern California. It reads like it was some sort of simple SQL injection and upon gleaning the information he reported it.
<.. snip ..> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Determining the encryption used, Art Cooper |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Pentester convicted thread, Dogten |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Pentester convicted.., Art Cooper |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Pentester convicted.., Art Cooper |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |