Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: NMap Scanning Issues |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:24:10 -0500 |
You could try and slow your scans down by using the -T option. The scans will take longer, obviously, but you would get better results if packets are being dropped due to congestion.
If you try and run a selective port scan immediately after the 1-1024 or 1-65535 scan, do you get the original results, or the supposed erroneous ones from the 1-1024 . . . ?
I have had a firewall/IPS black-hole me after performing a multiple port scan. Slowing the scan _way_ down works, but it's slow. But, If there isn't a firewall on the other side then it shouldn't be an issue.
hth, Reid
I am trying to run Nmap both on specific ports and then multiple ports (1-1024, 1-65535, etc). My issue or is this: when I run small port scans; my results come back fine (open, closed, filtered). I have confirmed that the results are accurate. However, when I attempt to scan multiple ports I get various unreliable results. For instance, a port that I could have confirmed either open or closed may show up as filtered or the opposite.
No configuration changes have been made and no firewall on remote site.
Additional Notes:
-I am running over the Internet
-I am running from behind a Netgear Firewall/VPN/Router (FW114) with NAT
-Cable/DSL Connection (Fast)
I am wondering if my router is timing out or perhaps I am performing a DOS of my own router. Does any have any thoughts or experienced this type of problem? If so, does anyone have any recommendations?
Thanks,
09Sparky
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Nmap scanning speed, chrismc |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: privelege escalation with .bat files, Nicolas RUFF |
| Previous by Thread: | NMap Scanning Issues, 09Sparky |
| Next by Thread: | Article: 5 common Web app vulnerabilities, Erin Carroll |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |