Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Overflowing Scripts fail to work |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 22 Apr 2006 10:30:43 +0200 |
Hallo list!
I've been on this for quite some time and after failing to find out
anything on the Internet I've finally decided to propose this question
here. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Due to interest I have started to try to understand
buffer-overflow-attacks. The theory is fine with me. But now I'm getting
quite some trouble when trying to write exploiting scripts.
Let me show you what I mean:
The program I'll be using consists of those few lines of C-code.
###Content of test.c#######################
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
char buffer[512];
setuid(0);
seteuid(0);
strcpy(buffer, argv[1]);
printf("%s\n",buffer);
return(0);
}
###########################################
This is more or less the average "vulnerable" Program.
Ok; now I compile it and then have a go at it from the shell:
--------------------------------------------------------------
xyz@localhost ~ $ ./test `python -c "print 'A' * 524"`
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Speicherzugriffsfehler (core dumped)
--------------------------------------------------------------
As expected the program crashes with a segmentation fault.
When firing up gdb with the coredump it can also be seen that the
segmentation fault was caused by the registers being filled with "41".
So far so good.
Now for the part that puzzles me:
I put exactly the same thing into a script:
###Content of exp.py########################
#! /bin/env python
import os
os.system("./test "+("A" * 524))
############################################
Now when I'm running it I get no overflow at all:
-------------------------------------------------------------
xyz@localhost ~ $ ./exp.py
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
--------------------------------------------------------------
To make sure I increased the number of As until 10000.
Still nothing happens.
I don't know what do do with this.
Some more information that might be of need:
I'm running Gentoo-Linux with a 2.6.16-Kernel with the Gentoo-Patchset
applied.
Python version and C-Compiler:
Python 2.4.2 (#1, Feb 5 2006, 10:03:22)
[GCC 3.3.6 (Gentoo 3.3.6, ssp-3.3.6-1.0, pie-8.7.8)] on linux2
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! If anyone
should need any other information please tell me.
MfG
Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Concerned about Web Application Security?
Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's
Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise,
you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the
most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration
testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a
managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software
(Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can
help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php
And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your
results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RAS Gurus, William Hancock |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Which language for sorting scan results?, Paul Sebastian Ziegler |
| Previous by Thread: | Ghost Image File Protection, AdamT |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Overflowing Scripts fail to work, Don Bailey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |