Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:57:28 +0200 |
Craig,
You like to keep on my toes, that's for sure.
Pete stated: default banners ..."wouldn't be the threat, they would be the vulnerability if you're talking Risk"
I would not even classify them as a vulnerability. They may form a part of an attack vector or a link in an attack tree, but not a vulnerability.
Knowing the structure of the web site is not in itself a risk or vulnerability. It can comprise a branch in an attack tree, but can not facilitate an attack in itself.
In response to "Risk is relative to the organization not to you." This depends on the method used to determine risk. A "fluffy" qualitative risk analysis (there are better or worse qualitative techniques) based on opinion will fit this description. A detailed quantitative analysis using Stochastically defined models and a Bayesian likelihood analysis, maybe even integrating Bayesian linguistic techniques is fairly definitive no matter where you are.
Sincerely, -pete.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: About AsyncOS from IronPort, Lynx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Wireless Audit Reports, Shenk, Jerry A |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive?, Craig Wright |
| Next by Thread: | Re: vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive?, Joel Jose |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |