Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Wireless Audit Reports |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:14:00 -0800 |
-----Original Message----- From: Matthew Webster [mailto:awakenings@mindspring.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 6:47 AM To: pen-test@securityfocus.com Subject: Wireless Audit Reports Hi, I work in an environment that has a policy that does not permit wireless devices. We still do an "audit" of the area to ensure that there are no wireless devices in our area. I wish to prove that there are no devices. Being in a city, there are literally hundreds of wireless networks present - perhaps up to 50 in any one given area of our building. I have tracked the signals down and have determined
that
there are no rogue access points or peer networks hidden in our
portion
of the building.
Now a traditional wireless audit would be easy. I could report
the signal strengths of our devices, if the SSID's are correct, are
non-broadcast, etc. That would be an easy report to create after data
collection. In this case, I am trying to prove a negative. I can
list
networks, signal strengths, etc. but I feel like I am fluffing the report with meaningless and time wasting statistics. Does anyone have any experience in what they would report under these circumstances?
Being on the Las Vegas Strip crowded with a bunch of other casinos, shops, malls, Starbucks, and everything else, the wireless spectrum over here is pretty crowded and we get a fair amount of bleed into our property. Having had to do something like this before, I went with the "traditional" type of report like you detailed, listing all detected networks, SSIDs, channels, encryption enabled, etc... but from a different slant. The purpose was twofold- one was to show how much signal was invading our airspace and how strong it was. Since everyone around here is WiFi crazy, the airspace is heavily polluted in some areas with a lot of signal overlap especially with some of these people slapping amps and huge antennas on their APs to compensate for loss of signal (you would be surprised how far away you can pick up some properties' signals even without Yagis or anything special). Second (more important) was to show the number, if any, of networks that bled into here that were open or insecure. We don't want any of our devices accidentally associating themselves with those networks, and want to make sure that those networks can't be used to hurt us. Ian Hayes | Senior Systems Engineer Wynn Las Vegas 3131 South Las Vegas Blvd, Las Vegas, NV 89109 Ph (702) 770-3252 | Cell (702) 266-6002 Ian.hayes@wynnlasvegas.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Concerned about Web Application Security? As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/forms/ec.php?pubid=10025 And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive?, Kyle Maxwell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Using TTL to Locate Hosts, Joe |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: tcpdump reconstructor, Nikhil Mulley |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Wireless Audit Reports, Shenk, Jerry A |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |