Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:10:13 +0200 |
Hi,
have been able to access them as a piece of cake. Ofcourse the network is safe as long as the attacker doesnt "learn" the name of the important directories. But i think it is a very "huge" vulnerability. and nessus didnt even give a hinch!!
and one more quest. How many of you think that the existance of the default banners in services(eg apache default error pages) are a security threat, if not high, atleast medium?. I do.
I know, I over-answered. Sorry. Ya'll can wake up now.
Sincerely, -pete.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive?, James Davis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Wireless Audit Reports, David M. Zendzian |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive?, James Davis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive?, Kyle Maxwell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |