Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:23:38 +0800 |
"Joel Jose" <joeljose420@BonBon.net> No Phone Info Available 03/30/2006 12:03 AM
To <pen-test@securityfocus.com> cc
Subject vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive?
hy ppl,
i was pen-testing a network. First i do a manual check with my
own methods, i use nmap,hping,metasploit,telnet,dig,whois..etc and then
for the confirmation i scan with nessus, just to be sure that i havent
overlooked any. But, today something very strange happened; i found a huge
vulnerability which could drastically compramise the network. The
directories were not protected. I could easily access the template
directory, and view the internal directory structure. I even got access to
a few files, which contained backup data of some of thier old employees.
now, if i had "known" the names of the *important* diectories, i am sure i
would have been able to access them as a piece of cake. Ofcourse the network is
safe as long as the attacker doesnt "learn" the name of the important
directories. But i think it is a very "huge" vulnerability. and nessus
didnt even give a hinch!!
and one more quest. How many of you think that the existance of the default banners in services(eg apache default error pages) are a security threat, if not high, atleast medium?. I do.
joel.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Concerned about Web Application Security? As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/forms/ec.php?pubid=10025 And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your
results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive?, Joel Jose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | AW: Using TTL to Locate Hosts, Meidinger Chris |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive?, Kyle Maxwell |
| Next by Thread: | RE: vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive?, Craig Wright |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |