Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Security test of firewall dose not show UDP port 500 is open |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:43:59 +0100 |
Hi MTK, Two possible scenarios: 1) Pix is an IPsec end-point. In this scenarios pix will reply only if "isakmp enable interface-name" is set. 2) Pix is forwarding isakmp UDP500 to an internal IPsec end-point. In this scenario behavior may vary if the forwarded system has isakmp up and running or not. My guess is that your pix is forwarding ISAKMP to an internal host (a VPN server probably), that would explain those different scan results. Try looking on the config for a static mapping like this: static (inside,outside) udp interface 500 internal_host 500 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 Cheers, Arley -----Original Message----- From: mtk@mrc.dk [mailto:mtk@mrc.dk] Sent: segunda-feira, 27 de Março de 2006 8:45 To: pen-test@securityfocus.com Subject: Security test of firewall dose not show UDP port 500 is open Hi all, We have been using Nessus for security scanning the Cisco Pix firewalls we install for our custemers. I have one "old" repport showing ISAKMP UDM port 500 is open. The firewall isn't updated but now the port has disapeard fro the new rapport? We have asked Cisco if the securiyt scanner is supposed to find UDP port 500 (I don't think so) and a CCIE from Cisco have told us "no the port is hidden." I wonder how the port can be in the old repport? If any one has any input please let me know. Best regards, MTK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Concerned about Web Application Security? As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/forms/ec.php?pubid=10025 And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: Vulnerability discovered on Lotus Domino server "admin4.nsf", ron |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Canned audits, sol |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SV: Security test of firewall dose not show UDP port 500 is open, Davide Carnevali |
| Next by Thread: | Swivel Authentication Evaluation, V1N0D |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |