Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Trust Relationship Analysis |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:58:04 -0600 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Defining trusts is really going to be more of a manual process then leaning on any kind of tool set. While some tools are great for determining basic access, there are none to my knowledge that will discern if that access is granted via 'good ol fashion' trust v. simple inclusion type access. If I had this task ahead of me, I'd start with an up to date topology map, identify the servers that have the ability to lean on a trust relationship (MS Domain, NIS Cloud, etc) and then visit each host to review if there are any relationships set up, from there identify the machines that fall under the control of those 'master' servers. At that point you'll have a pretty accurate view of relationships in your network. Beyond that you'll be doing a ton of scanning with vary suspect results, and because a port opens on a target from some source doesn't mean there is a trust established. Bill Hancock www.exactconsutling.com Roman Tomazi wrote:
As part of a VA and Pen Test my company has been tasked to do, we have been asked to carry out a review of host and network trust relationships within the clients environment. Are there any best practices and/or tools used to facilitate this kind of analysis? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEJAj8oShIrIREThQRArADAKCZMgLX3/tH7/lTs0BnMdfHtNdfQQCgkoH4 8r1IA/K1+Nt96CcnVlDar9s= =8ngy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Concerned about Web Application Security? As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/forms/ec.php?pubid=10025 And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Penetration Test - PHP / APACHE, Martin Mačok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: What tools do you use?, jmporcel |
| Previous by Thread: | Trust Relationship Analysis, Roman Tomazi |
| Next by Thread: | Fwd: Trust Relationship Analysis, Roman Tomazi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |