Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Rookie question about differences between -S and -sI option |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:25:55 -0500 |
then I tried to spoof my ip scanning the same target like that : nmap -vv -P0 -T4 -S xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ( spoofed ) -e eth0 xxx.xxx.xxx.50 ( same target as simple scan ) but I obtained every port closed even if nmap scanned clearly the same target as the original trivial scan against xxx.xxx.xxx.50.
Ok, that's a little different.
First, what kind of host are you using as an idle system? If that
system is a Linux or other recent Unix system, it's likely that they've
eliminated the IP ID information leak. I know Linux and OpenBSD have
eliminated it, and other BSDs probably have as well. Only less secure
systems, such as Windows or network devices/printers leak information
about their packet rates.
If you aren't sure what the OS is on the idle system, you could ping it
from two seperate source IPs. If the IP IDs between the two ping
sequences aren't correlated at all, then you're probably not dealing
with a vulnerable IP implementation.
tim
PS- I think you forgot to CC the list on your last message. Since this
may be useful to some, I'll go ahead and post it back.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner:
Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your
website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms,
login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are
futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities
to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do!
Download Trial at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: local proxy udp 53, Aaron |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Invision Power Board Army System Mod <= 2.1 SQL Injection Exploit, Cristian Stoica |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Rookie question about differences between -S and -sI option, Tim |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Rookie question about differences between -S and -sI option, Mark Fosseth |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |