Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: pushing exploits through the Firewall |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:12:23 -0600 |
Mike, So what I think you may be getting at is one of two things: 1. Most BIND exploits are TCP-based, and most sharp firewalls admins allow only UDP. In this case, no dice. Three or four years ago there was a UDP based exploit for BIND, some vuln in recursion I think...anyway go Google. :) 2. Some of the BIND exploits were attacked via overflow in the protocol headers, so if you are facing a firewall that does some protocol validation, and DNS is a common/easy one to do, then you exploit may be blocked over TCP by a protocol validator that sees a non-RFC compliant/sized header. 3. There's lots of third options that may or may not be viable. Look for a proxy with CONNECT method enabled to the outside world, and shove a TCP connection to the BIND server through their proxy, or Citrix box, or anything else you can find open. -ae
-----Original Message----- From: Julian Totzek [mailto:julian.totzek@bristol.de] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:32 PM To: Mike Gilligan; pen-test@securityfocus.com Subject: AW: pushing exploits through the FirewallHi group Say a pentester manages to discover a vulnerable version of BINDrunningon an external DNS server and has successfully sourced anexploit for thevuln. I'm curious how it would be possible to launch the exploitagainst theserver when a packet filtering device and statefulinspection Firewall sitbetween the pentester and the vuln host. It would seem atfirst glancethat this is not a viable option. How else might one go about exploitingthevuln?Hi Mike, remember, a firewall is mostly controlling the entrance but not the application itself. So if there is a exploit running on port UDP 53 the firewall will let it pass, cause it only knows port 53 UDP is legitimate traffic. Sometimes there are some kind of filter enabled in firewalls which will block these exploits, but normally there is nothing ;-) So just go for it and try it :-) -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms, login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do! Download Trial at: http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831 -------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms, login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do! Download Trial at: http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Password Crackers, xelerated |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: local proxy udp 53, Aaron |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: pushing exploits through the Firewall, c . ehlen |
| Next by Thread: | Testing two bank laptops. winxp vpn client, Bob WIlliams |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |