Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | FW: DNS ACL ? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 17 Nov 2005 03:06:58 -0500 |
Guess moderation doesn't work sometimes.
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
pen-test@securityfocus.com mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at pen-test-owner@securityfocus.com.
I'm sorry, the list moderators for the pen-test list
have failed to act on your post. Thus, I'm returning it to you.
If you feel that this is in error, please repost the message
or contact a list moderator directly.
--- Enclosed, please find the message you sent.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dario Ciccarone (dciccaro)
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 12:26 AM
To: John Hally; pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: DNS ACL ?
Yup.
RFC-1035 specifies that DNS queries should use UDP as transport - and
queries are sent to the DNS server IP address, port 53. If the server
finds that the answer section is > 512 bytes, it should reply with at
most 512 bytes and set the TC bit in the answer. Is up to the host
performing the query to retry it using TCP. Check section '4.2.
Transport' on the RFC.
RFC-2671 ('Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0)') updates RFC-2671 and
allows for packet sizes > 512 when using UDP as transport.
A reference from MS: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/828263
Some queries that might exceed the 512-byte size are those like, for
example, www.microsoft.com or www.yahoo.com, due to the number of A
records returned.
So, you will probably be OK with only allowing 53/udp to your DNS
server.
Thanks,
Dario
-----Original Message----- From: John Hally [mailto:JHally@epnet.com] Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 8:35 AM To: 'pen-test@securityfocus.com' Subject: DNS ACL ? Hello All, I need a sanity check regarding DNS ACLs. For external facing DNS servers you need to allow only udp/53 inbound, correct? I know tcp/53 is used for zone transfers and requests/replies greater than a certain size, but they shouldn't typically happen for general dns queries correct? Thanks in advance! -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms, login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do! Download Trial at: http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831 -------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms, login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do! Download Trial at: http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | New SecurityFocus article on rootkits, Erin Carroll |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Nmap scanning speed, Chris Moody |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: DNS ACL ?, Maher Odeh |
| Next by Thread: | RE: DNS ACL ?, Kyle Quest |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |