Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Vuln Scanner |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 14 Nov 2005 05:05:09 -0800 |
-----Original Message----- From: Evans, Arian [mailto:Arian.Evans@fishnetsecurity.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:13 AM To: Talisker; pen-test@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Vuln Scanner 1. You mean "control" of the scan engine; that distinction makes sense Andy. 2. I was thinking you meant "aggregation" of scan data, in which case most any scanner out there can be centrally aggregated by use of a SEM product. <blurriness> And then there are tools like eEye Retina that are NOT distributed-control, but really "aggregated" (unless they've recently changed Retina/REM). You have to go to each distribution point to issue commands, but have a central console to aggregate *events* the scans produce.
If you mean distributed control as in being able to goto one central location to manage multiple different scanners (manage policies, scan jobs, etc...) then we've done that for a while and recently we do it even better in REM 3.0. With things like job load balancing at a central location, open-scanner-first, fail over scanning, bla bla etc... The two largest vulnerability management deployments in the world are both customers of ours and obviously that wouldn't be the case if we simply just aggerated events to a central location. An older version of REM was just for event aggregation so maybe that is the version your reffering too. If anyone wants to know more feel free to contact me directly, I'm don't want to bore everyone with a "my products better" pitch, even if it is. :-)
So yes, it would be valuable to some break out who does and who doesn't have a native console that can *control* distributed installs.
<snip>
-ae
Signed, Marc Maiffret Chief Hacking Officer eEye Digital Security T.949.349.9062 F.949.349.9538 http://eEye.com/Blink - End-Point Vulnerability Prevention http://eEye.com/Retina - Network Security Scanner http://eEye.com/Iris - Network Traffic Analyzer http://eEye.com/SecureIIS - Stop known and unknown IIS vulnerabilities ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms, login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do! Download Trial at: http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RC4-128 tool?, Alexander Klimov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Network Security Assessment - 2nd edition, Chris McNab |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Vuln Scanner, Evans, Arian |
| Next by Thread: | Risk metrics, RSMC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |