Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Pen test - Attorney client Privilege? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 20 Oct 2005 07:44:28 +1000 |
Not all communications are considered privileged Not all privileged conversations can be kept from the court There are cases where so called "privileged" information can be made available in discovery. It depends on the nature of the information. Often this will be delivered to the court and the judge will decide if it should remain closed A Pen test is highly unlikely to remain in this form Discovery could request the reports directly from the Pen Tester - thus by passing privilege any way. -----Original Message----- From: Paul Robertson [mailto:compuwar@gmail.com] Sent: 19 October 2005 11:01 To: Lyal Collins Cc: rob havelt; pen-test@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Pen test - Attorney client Privilege? On 10/19/05, Lyal Collins <lyal.collins@key2it.com.au> wrote:
I'm not a lawyer either, but see a couple of interesting twists to this approach, in some situations.
I'm still not a lawyer...
In the case of the credit card PCI standard, evidence of vulnerability/pen-test activities need to be made available to the accredited PCI auditor (for mid-large sites, anyway). Taking this to one possible extrapolation, will the lawyers be providing relevant statements regarding conduct of tests to the PCI auditor who then relies upon these statements for their own legal indemnity in making statements towards the site's PCI compliance? Are the lawyers going to make assessments as to the meanings and outcomes of the pen/vuln testing to PCI or other auditors? Does this make lawyers involved in liability to one or more third parties with whom the law firm (usually) has no commercial, contractual or legal relationship (e.g. Acquiring Bank, Card Scheme,
PCI Auditor)?
Would/could this cause the confidentiality shield to be punctured?
Yes, it would. According to my research, disclosure to any 3rd party not directly involved in the litigation or pre-litigation process on behalf of the client or the client's counsel invalidates privilege. Paul -- www.compuwar.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms, login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do! Download Trial at: http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms, login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do! Download Trial at: http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Pen test - Attorney client Privilege?, Craig Wright |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: large pcap file..., Thorsten Holz |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Pen test - Attorney client Privilege?, Craig Wright |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Pen test - Attorney client Privilege?, Paul Robertson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |