Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Full-disclosure] Re: Av, spyware, ddl trojan assesment |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:21:14 +1200 |
Sherwyn Williams wrote:
Hey list, I know this is not a how to protect your pc list. But I would like to know what are some good AV, spyware, adware, and software firewalls to use. I have to come up with a plan for a few of my clients who are always being infected.
If your clients really are "always being infected" then none of these reactive, updated-to-detect/handle-the-thing-after-the-event approaches will actually help your clients much. If they really are "always being infected" then the problem is that they [double-]click on pretty much everything. If they really are "always being infected" then their behaviour and belief-sets are the problem, not the brand choice of anti- <whatever>ware is installed (or not) on their PCs. If they really are "always being infected" then they will continue to get infected regardless of which brand[s] of anti-<whatever>ware you install because they will continue to keep giving the new <whatever>s free reign on their machines before the recommended anti-<whatever>ware has been updated to detect/intercept/handle/block these new versions. Reactive solutions such as you have asked for recommendations for are continually sidestepped/deactivated/bypassed by new <whatever>s because, BY DESIGN, those reactive "solutions" let the bad guy play first. If your clients really are "always being infected" then they will continue to "always be infected" so long as they are allowed to use computers that trivially allow them to run arbitrary code from unauthorized sources. There is, today, no really useful anti- arbitrary_code_from_unauthorized_sources-ware, so you are stuck with clients that will always be infected.
All help is welcome.
My pleasure... -- Nick FitzGerald Computer Virus Consulting Ltd. Ph/FAX: +64 3 3267092 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Full-disclosure] Av, spyware, ddl trojan assesment, Sherwyn Williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Passwords with Lan Manager (LM) under Windows, Thor (Hammer of God) |
| Previous by Thread: | [Full-disclosure] Av, spyware, ddl trojan assesment, Sherwyn Williams |
| Next by Thread: | [Full-disclosure] Exploiting a Worm, Ian Gizak |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |