Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: verify HTTPS 'vulnerabilities' |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:01:15 -0700 |
Hi Dan, I would first check out the NASL script in Nessus to see the exact code that was able to detect these issues. As you already know the IP is correct, I wouldn't follow this up any further. After that I would use Mozilla and configure the settings to allow connections to the cypher Nessus is reporting. If the connection is allowed and you get a basic auth prompt, voila! If you know any logins on the box why not brute force the basic auth...why stop at these issues? Cheers, Jordan List, Simple question: I have a report from Nessus telling me that a web server is offering 'export class' cyphers for it's SSL/TLS service. Nessus also managed to obtain an internal IP address from the host (which is correct). Only HTTPS is open. However the target host requires basic authentication, and I don't have any credentials to obtain access. I would like to verify these manually, and would usually just use something like wfetch. However, I'm not getting the usual prompt that my encryption is too weak. Instead in the response I can see a message saying the page cannot be displayed. There is also no sign of the internal IP address. Can anyone tell me how they would prove that they are not false positives (I know the IP address is correct, but the client may want to replicate the vulnerability so they can be sure when they go to fix it)? thanks Dan
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Unknown App, ilaiy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: DECODING EMAILS BETWEEN MS EXCHANGE AND A CLIENT, Steve A |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: verify HTTPS 'vulnerabilities', Jarmon, Don R |
| Next by Thread: | RE: verify HTTPS 'vulnerabilities', Carl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |