Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Netcat through Squid HTTP Proxy |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 18 May 2005 13:25:49 +0200 |
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 03:34:16PM +0200, Christoph Puppe wrote:
Henderson, Dennis K. schrieb:It seems like he was looking for information on how to prevent this.The most thorough way to prevent proxy abuses, that use the CONNECT feature to simulate valid HTTPS traffic, is breaking up all this connections, decrypted and have them scrutinized with your normal content security tool. The Proxy acts like a man in the middle attacker, it get's the HTTPS connection, produces a certificate that matches the site beeing requested and presents this to the client. The client agrees on a session-key with the proxy and starts sending requests. The proxy pipes this requests through some logic to determine if this is an OK request, most firewalls and CS-Tools will do this for you. Then the proxy opens a new connection to the site requested, checks the certificate and sends the requests. The results are processed likewise. Sounds complicated? It's a little more challenging than a simple proxy and the clients all need to have a new Root-CA-Certificate, that is used by the proxy to sign the fake-certificates. Works fine. Keeps the tunnels closed _and_ you get content security for https connections. No more viruses from Web-Mail accounts that use https. Of course, setting the firewall so, that the proxy may only connect to 80,443,8080 and other well known http/s ports should be done. Monitoring logfiles is a good idea as well.
The problem, of course, being that this makes verification of the remote
end of the connection impossible as well as compromising privacy for the
parties behind the firewall.
So this will also make HTTPS less useful for the user. There is a trade
off here...
Joachim
pgpuKTR7JfRQT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Port 9090 WServer??, Nathan Einwechter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Port 9090 WServer??, xyberpix |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Netcat through Squid HTTP Proxy, Christoph Puppe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Netcat through Squid HTTP Proxy, Rogan Dawes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |