Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: DDos within a pentest |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 17 May 2005 15:45:27 +0200 |
Julian Totzek schrieb:
Hi group, within a pentest we trying to offer the possibility of a DDos Foold for our customers. I know there are many tools to do a flood from a single PC, but all of these tools just send as many syn's as the can. Does anybody know a tool where I'm able to limit the bandwidth? I donât want to get a bandwidth overload, I just want to show that the server is not able to handle all the syn packets.
Try hping with the -i switch you can set the rate of the generated packets. You have to prevent your host from answering RST on the returned SYN-ACK. See "man iptables" for that ;)
An other question is from where would I start such a attack? We only have a 2Mbit line here in the office, so if I need to flood a 10Mbit line there will not be enough packets to do this, right? Maybe there is a provider out there who already offers this service!
For SYN-Floods you don't need to saturate the line. Most OS kann keep about 100-300 Half-Open Connections and have them stay for 10-120 seconds. So you only need a few unanswered SYNs to tie up the half-open stack.
The third question is what will be the side effects if I send packets with spoofed sources? As you all know I don't a answer to my packets, but would it be a DDos to all spoofed sources then? How can you ensure that only the main target is getting flooded?
Don't use other, unrelated persons and providers IP-Numbers. That is rude and script-kiddy style. If you can't controll the sending host, have your firewall discard all traffik to a certain IP and use this address. As you are from Germany, see my article in ix on the topic: http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/2005/04/107/ -- Mit freundlichen GrÃÃen Christoph Puppe Security Consultant We secure your business.(TM) _______________________________________________________ HiSolutions AG Phone: +49 30 533289-0 BouchÃstrasse 12 Fax: +49 30 533289-99 D-12435 Berlin Internet: http://www.hisolutions.com _______________________________________________________
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Netcat through Squid HTTP Proxy, Christoph Puppe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Cisco VPN Concentrator GUI, Atte Peltomaki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: DDos within a pentest, Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez |
| Next by Thread: | Re: DDos within a pentest, Christoph Puppe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |