Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Pen-Test
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Mapping Class A network ( any easy trick?)

Subject: RE: Mapping Class A network ( any easy trick?)
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:13:23 +0100
Hi, 

What is the problem with 17 million pings? If you turn of DNS resolution
it will be quite fast, even on a 10 mbit LAN. Don't use broadcast pings:
you don't know where the subnet boundaries are and therefore won't be
able to know the broadcast addresses. If it really is a /8 network (i.e.
flat, which I doubt) then you could use broadcast pings, but please note
that:
A: not all devices that respond to ping respond to broadcast ping
B: you will miss replies due to the fact that many devices will answer
simultanesouly

You might also want to manage expectations. Pentesting a full class A,
even given low population of the network will take you months. I think
what you really want to do is a vulnerability scan. Just that part,
running nmap and nessus on a full class A will keep you busy for a while
:-) Just make sure the client is aware that not all IP's on his class A
will be hit. 

--Ralph
 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Thomas [mailto:mjohn2000_99@yahoo.com] 
Sent: 08 February 2005 17:42
To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Mapping Class A network ( any easy trick?)

--- Virus checked / op virussen gecontroleerd ---



I am about to do a penetration testing on a "Class A network" and
wondering how I can map the network without pinging 17 million IPs.(nmap
-Sp 10.0.0.0/8) 

I did some research and the best information I got is from one of the
earlier post on this
list(http://seclists.org/lists/pen-test/2004/Jul/0067.html)
. It was to use broadcast IPs for pings. But it may miss some subnets. 

Is that the best way to it? If not, please advise 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
De informatie verzonden met dit e-mailbericht (en bijlagen) is uitsluitend 
bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n) en zij die van de geadresseerde(n) toestemming 
hebben dit bericht te lezen. Gebruik door anderen dan geadresseerde(n) is 
verboden. De informatie in dit e-mailbericht (en de bijlagen) kan vertrouwelijk 
van aard zijn en kan binnen het bereik vallen van een geheimhoudingsplicht.
KPMG is niet aansprakelijk voor schade ten gevolge van het gebruik van 
elektronische middelen van communicatie, daaronder begrepen -maar niet beperkt 
tot- schade ten gevolge van niet aflevering of vertraging bij de aflevering van 
elektronische berichten, onderschepping of manipulatie van elektronische 
berichten door derden of door programmatuur/apparatuur gebruikt voor 
elektronische communicatie en overbrenging van virussen en andere kwaadaardige 
programmatuur.

Any information transmitted by means of this e-mail (and any of its 
attachments) is intended exclusively for the addressee or addressees and for 
those authorized by the addressee or addressees to read this message. Any use 
by a party other than the addressee or addressees is prohibited. The 
information contained in this e-mail (or any of its attachments) may be 
confidential in nature and fall under a duty of non-disclosure.
KPMG shall not be liable for damages resulting from the use of electronic means 
of communication, including -but not limited to- damages resulting from failure 
or delay in delivery of electronic communications, interception or manipulation 
of electronic communications by third parties or by computer programs used for 
electronic communications and transmission of viruses and other malicious code.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>