Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: tcp oddities. |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:36:58 -0500 |
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 09:29, Josh Nunan wrote:
After syn-scanning an IP block, I noticed that an ip address in the dns records as a mail server did not have tcp/25 open... I telnet'd to it... and to my suprise there was an smtp server sitting on port 25.
It looks like you have an IPS (or smart firewall) inline between yourself and the mail server. The difference between the nmap SYN packet and your TCP connect SYN packet is that the nmap SYN packet has a small window size (1024) whereas your connect attempt sends a SYN packet with a "normal" window size. Also, the SYN scan SYN packet does not include a TCP option header that advertises the maximum segment size while the connect SYN packet does. So it would appear that you have an intelligent device that is able to distinguish between an "nmap scan" (window=1024, no MSS) and a normal connection attempt (window>1024, MSS present and >0). Which means that for the rest of your engagement you might want to use connect scans instead of just SYN scans :) Regards, Frank
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Web Application Tester, A.R. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Web Application Tester, Hayden Searle |
| Previous by Thread: | tcp oddities., Josh Nunan |
| Next by Thread: | Web Application Tester, Andrew Bagrin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |