Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Remote host dead? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:55:34 -0400 |
On Jun 24, 2008, at 4:14 AM, Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:
Another Windows issue (I guess): If I create a new policy, and enter "credentials", the window gets screw (same text is duplicated upper and down, using "half" a font :)).
I don't seem to be able to replicate this using the client included with Nessus Windows 3.2.1. Would you mind upgrading to that and seeing if it resolves the issue? If not, send me a screenshot along with some more details about how to reproduce the issue and I'll forward it to the developers.
1.- If I check the three marks (icmp, tcp, arp), I suppose the host will only be detected as dead when the three tests fail, am I right?
No, if either test fails, the host will be marked as dead.
2.- When a host is detected as dead, is it right to assume that all modules (ping_host.nasl, dont_scan_printers.nasl, etc) got a failure? In other words, the host is alive when at least one of the modules thinks so (some kind of "OR" logical operation), and it is dead when all modules fail (logical "AND"). Right?
No, marking a host as dead prevents Nessus from launching further plugins against it.
No, it's a LAN connection (ADSL). Btw, is there any doc discussing Windows vs Linux version differences such as the former one?
I don't think so, but I'm not sure. The PPP / PPTP interface issue is mentioned in the 3.2 Installation Guide (look for it at http://www.nessus.org/documentation/), as is the inability to do a TCP Connect scan using Nessus Windows (because of limitations in the Windows TCP/IP stack). George -- theall@tenablesecurity.com _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TemplatesXSL for ".nessus" format, Ron Gula |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | recommended operating system for Nessus, Micha Borrmann |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Remote host dead?, Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Remote host dead?, Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |