Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Remote host dead? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:39:46 +0200 |
George A. Theall escribió:
On Jun 23, 2008, at 3:21 PM, Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:I'm trying to scan a host with the default policy. The host is alive and responding to pings. I got no results when scanning with Nessus 3.2.0 (Windows). Looking at scan.log (in he "logs" dir), I can see a "remote host is dead". But my question is why? If I run nmap against the host, I can see unprivileged ports open (>1024) and of course it's responding to ping. I also entered 1-65535 in "port scanner range".Hi Roman.
Hello,
Is the remote host a printer or some type of multifunction device? By default, Nessus will try to identify hosts that are and mark them as dead because many such devices don't react very well to scanning, even a basic port scan. If so, you can edit the scan policy and check "Scan Network Printers" (look on the "Advanced" tab, under "Do not scan fragile devices").
No, it's not a multifunction device. Anyway, I had also thought of that possibility, and had done the following: I created a new policy and marked the two checks: scan network printer and novell netware hosts. I chose the new policy and rescanned, with no luck. Btw, the "do not scan fragile devices" will only appear if you create a new policy. Why doesn't it appear when editing default scan policy?
Also, Nessus doesn't use ICMP pings by default but instead sends TCP pings to a limited number of ports. You could either choose to do an ICMP ping or make sure that one of the TCP ports you know to be open is included in the list of TCP ports to be pinged (look under the "Advanced" tab, under "Ping the remote host", "TCP ping destination port(s)"). Or you can disable the Ping port scan altogether.
I disabled the ping scan and it didn't work either. But... I reenabled ping and check icmp ping in advanced options, and now it worked!! I suppose that Nessus marks a host as dead if all tests failed, and now that icmp ping is being checked, the host is no longer mark as dead... is it right? Anyway, I'm still a bit confused because letting only marked the "Nessus TCP scanner" option (thus ping scanner disabled), and changing "port scanner range" from "default" to 1-65535, the host is still being marked as dead. What's the exact algorithm to mark a host as dead? And why are those ports not being used by TCP scanner?
Another question, how could I debug this? If I enable the option to "save a packet capture of the scan", I couldn't find any new log on logs dir (where should it be placed?)Unfortunately, Nessus Windows does not have support for saving packet captures. I suppose the alternate approach would be to use Wireshark alongside Nessus to see what's being sent and what's coming back. If my comments above don't help, that is.
Ok, I'll try it. Thanks for your comments, they are helpful.
Hope this helps, George
-- Saludos, -Roman PGP Fingerprint: 09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB 29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742 [Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ] _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Remote host dead?, George A. Theall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Remote host dead?, George A. Theall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Remote host dead?, George A. Theall |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Remote host dead?, George A. Theall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |