Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD Performance |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:24:04 -0600 (CST) |
bismark@foofus.net wrote:bismark@foofus.net wrote: Have you tried looking at CPU, Ram usage, Load etc etc... Is your CPU flat out? RAM usage is nominal, CPU usage is about 50% on both processors. Right now running a scan I've got some responsiveness but it will go away at some point. Is the IO usage spiking at some point to cause an increase in the load ?IO load seems to barely go up while a scan is running. This is from observation of the drive lights, haven't run an iostat though. The be_nice = yes change in my nessusd.conf file has made a HUGE change in responsiveness. Still not anywhere near the FreeBSD setup but at least I can run 30/20 hosts/checks and still have my system usable.I'm glad the be_nice setting helped out. I was also curious if the FreeBSD system took longer to scan than your Linux system. It would be interesting to note if the FreeBSD system was more responsive but also took longer to complete a scan.
As far as we could tell (Mark I eyeball) the FreeBSD system finished faster. We even disabled the be_nice setting on the FreeBSD laptop and it still stayed fairly responsive, a little sluggishness but nothing like on my system. Another thing when we do a count of the number of nessusd processes running, mine are significantly less. I'm guessing these has to do with how Linux and BSD handles threads and wondering if there may be some tuning options that could be done on Linux for this. Mind you these are all eyeball measurements, no formal numbers though. _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD Performance, bismark |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: no port scanner was enabled during the scan, George A. Theall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linux vs FreeBSD Performance, Michel Arboi |
| Next by Thread: | reading ssh credentials through GUI, marco |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |