Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Linux vs FreeBSD Performance |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:56:47 -0500 |
bismark@foofus.net wrote:
I'm running the current version of nessus on an x86_64 linux system and was comparing it to my coworker who runs FreeBSD. We both have the same hardware but he can have his system set to 70/30 on the hosts/checks and still have an extremely response system and no false positives in the scan results. If I try to even set anything close to those my system grinds to a halt and the results are extremely suspect. The question I have is what tuning can I do on Linux systems to make the performance somewhat similar. I'm guessing that I won't be able to match it because of the differences between the OS's network stack and kernel.
Hello, When you say same hardware, is it the exact same memory, CPU, disk, .etc? Are you running any extra applications on your Linux system such as a network monitor or a network IDS? What about a local firewall logging all connections in/out? Also, are you running the same exact scan configurations? You mention 70/30 hosts/checks, but I would be curious if you are also comparing the same scan configurations such as thorough checks. Lastly, I would also compare any process loads on the FreeBSD system to the Linux system. We've been very wary at Tenable to produce any sort of "this OS is faster than this OS" type of guidelines because there are many variables to consider. Ron Gula Tenable Network Security _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Linux vs FreeBSD Performance, bismark |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux vs FreeBSD Performance, bismark |
| Previous by Thread: | Linux vs FreeBSD Performance, bismark |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linux vs FreeBSD Performance, bismark |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |