Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | CVE-2007-1860 - no generic plugin |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:31:43 -0700 |
Hello, I noticed that for CVE-2007-1860, Nessus only has local checks for FreeBSD, Debian and Gentoo but no generic (non-OS specific plugin), in our case, we are running Red Hat, but mod_jk was installed via source not rpm. Basically we had an outside vendor did a vulnerability scan using a different tool and their software was able to pick up this vulnerability that wasn't on my report. Should I enable FreeBSD/Debian/Gentoo local checks even if I am running Red Hat? Thank you. -- Arthur Kao Systems Analyst University of Calgary _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Scheduling Nessus scans with Windows XP, Webmaster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Linux vs FreeBSD Performance, bismark |
| Previous by Thread: | Error: File is too long > 65,530, Rushing, Derek |
| Next by Thread: | Linux vs FreeBSD Performance, bismark |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |