Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Nessus-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

Buffer Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution ques

Subject: Buffer Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution question
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:20:05 -0600
Hi All...

I just ran a scan on one of our Windows servers, and it came up with the
following security warning:

Synopsis :



Arbitrary code can be executed on the remote host.





Description :



The remote host is running a version of Windows which is vulnerable to a

buffer overrun vulnerability when viewing a JPEG file, which may allow an

attacker to execute arbitrary code on the remote host.



To exploit this flaw, an attacker would need to send a malformed JPEG file

to a user on the remote host and wait for him to open it using an

affected Microsoft application.





Solution: 



Microsoft has released a set of patches for Windows NT, 2000, XP and 2003 :



http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-028.mspx





Risk Factor : 



High / CVSS Base Score : 9.3

(CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C)

CVE : CVE-2004-0200

BID : 11173

Other references : IAVA:2004-A-0015, IAVA:2004-t-0028, OSVDB:9951

Plugin ID : 14724

I thought that this was strange, as this server is completely up to date. I
checked to make sure, and the patch that Nessus recommended is already
applied to the server.

Why is this being flagged as a vulerability?
-----
Marc R. Hoffman
Computer Operations Manager
Morris Printing Group
Phone: 308.236.7888, Extension 6272
FAX: 928.441.6032
http://www.morrisprintinggroup.com

---------------------------------------------
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and
any attachments are for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and or legally
privileged information.   Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure,
or distribution is prohibited.   If you are
not the intended recipient(s) of this
message or if this message has
been addressed to you in error, please
notify the sender and delete or destroy
all copies of the original message.
---------------------------------------------

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>