Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: NT4 Scanning |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:34:01 +0200 |
On Oct 21, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Norma Snockers wrote:
Thank you. If Nessus will not flag these, the natural follow up question would be - which version of Nessus would be best for flagging the NT flaws that the latest version will not? Perhaps my question is irrelevant and the version does not matter - is it purely to do with the fact that the latest list of Nessus plugins no longer identifies flaws in NT4?
I probably did not make myself clear : Nessus (all versions)
identifies the _patched_ flaws in NT4. No version flags the unpatched
flaws.
-- Renaud
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: NT4 Scanning, Norma Snockers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Using Nessus for PCI, John Scherff |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: NT4 Scanning, Norma Snockers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NT4 Scanning, Norma Snockers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |