Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: FALSE POSITIVE |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:18:12 -0700 |
Nicolas, I have checked several systems manually. Each has version 2.0.0.3 installed. I've downloaded and installed the patch, but it only shows the "REMOVE" option (because the patch has already been installed). The servers all have the CAPICOM.Certificates.4 key, but they also have .1, .2 and .3. I'm convinced the plugin is working properly (per the information provided in the MS Bulletin). I think the problem is either (a) the bulletin is incorrect, or (b) the patch is broken. John -----Original Message----- From: nessus-bounces@list.nessus.org [mailto:nessus-bounces@list.nessus.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Pouvesle Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 11:03 AM To: nessus Subject: Re: FALSE POSITIVE On Jun 4, 2007, at 7:49 PM, John Scherff wrote:
I don't know if this FAQ item applies or not; the Company attribute is
"Microsoft Corporation." I doubt it's a custom CAPICOM (e.g., from Citrix) because even my desktop computer has CAPICOM 2.0.0.3, and the patch has been applied to it as well. But the MS bulletin definitely says, "If you have version 2.1.01 or lower, you should update your system," so Nessus is correct in marking
it as a vulnerability. Something must be broken in the Microsoft patch.
I don't know how MBSA works but if it uses the same technique as described in the advisory it may be the problem. The advisory recommends to check that the following key exists to know if the patch is installed : HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\CAPICOM.Certificates.4\CLSID However the activex is directly linked with this key : HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\CAPICOM.Certificates\CLSID When you install the patch the "Certificates.4" key is created and the "Certificates" key is replaced. However if you install another application that uses capicom, the key "Certificates" may be replaced with an older version of the activex. Then, even if you installed the patch, the older activex version can be used. Nicolas _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: FALSE POSITIVE, Nicolas Pouvesle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Nessus 2.2.6 does no portscan with all plugins, Frank Meier |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: FALSE POSITIVE, Nicolas Pouvesle |
| Next by Thread: | FALSE POSITIVE, John Scherff |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |